Obama and his lapdogs, the legacy media outlets, have put me in a rather strange dilemma... whether to laugh or to cry.
Obama had precisely nothing of meaning to say about the situation in Libya until the UN Security Council decided Ghadafi was bad. So they are going to impose a no-fly zone over a sovereign country, who it could be argued, is merely trying to quell a foreign funded insurrection. Which is not untrue.
I could detail the reasons why Ghadafi is evil incarnate, falling just short of Idi Amin in the way of evil, except Ghadafi has not been accused of cannibalism... yet. And I say yet because in order for the UN and the US media to complete their portrayal of Ghadafi as a complete misanthropic bastard they have to try to overcome the complete asinine decision to put Libya on the human rights committee.
Ghadafi is not a friend of the US, but aside from the Lockerbie bombing Libya has not been an enemy either. He feared the US, offering to turn over his entire nuke program to the Brits in exchange for the US not bombing his house again while they conducted GW2. Of course he later amended his offer for his nukes in exchange for British and US conventional weapons, which everyone thought was a fair trade.
But back to why Obama is an embarrassing non-leader... after the UN granted Libya a seat on the Human Rights Committee they authorized armed force against Ghadafi because of his human rights violations. So when was the UN right, granted the grandfatherly author of children's books a high prestige position in the UN, or when the UN decided the strong arm dictator was committing genocide?

Obama, basing his position on Libya based on the schizophrenic asshats in the UN, demonstrates that he cannot make any decisions that don't involve brackets for the NCAA tournaments (and even there he chose the 1st seed in each division to make it to the final four.. not exactly taking any risks there.)
Don't get me wrong, Ghadafi is a blemish on the world, but he had been a relatively harmless blemish. And since there is credible evidence that his insurrection is being orchestrated by Al Qaeda, fighting along side him, instead of against him, might be in the best interests of the US.
But the Undecider took the path of least resistance and drifted along with the current... but what if the current is forcing his rudderless craft towards the precipice of a raging waterfall?
From his first crisis while in office, when he backed the legally deposed former President over the constitutionally backed President Obama is always on the wrong side of things to when he waited until Mubarack was on the ropes then jumped ugly and the Saudi King publicly told him to back off and let his former ally save face. Lets hope this is not another one of those times.


